<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: It&#8217;s Not Easy Being Green</title>
	<atom:link href="http://mushroomfactor.com/its-not-easy-being-green/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://mushroomfactor.com/its-not-easy-being-green</link>
	<description>and other expanding joys of historic renovation</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 24 Jul 2011 03:33:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.5</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: man</title>
		<link>http://mushroomfactor.com/its-not-easy-being-green/comment-page-1#comment-1419</link>
		<dc:creator>man</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Jul 2011 03:33:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mushroomfactor.com/its-not-easy-being-green#comment-1419</guid>
		<description>ok you are wrong about the burning of wood. burning wood is better for the enviorment than fossel fuels because trees take the carbon from the air and when you burn the wood your just returning the carbon that was recently in the air back to it. With fossel fuels your burning carbon that was taken out of the air millions of years ago. I have to disagree with you on that one. just google carbon cyle</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ok you are wrong about the burning of wood. burning wood is better for the enviorment than fossel fuels because trees take the carbon from the air and when you burn the wood your just returning the carbon that was recently in the air back to it. With fossel fuels your burning carbon that was taken out of the air millions of years ago. I have to disagree with you on that one. just google carbon cyle</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

